Thursday, December 13, 2012

IF I WERE THE PRIME MINISTER

Dear Friends,
When we were young-in school-one of the most frequently asked questions was "what will you do if you become the Prime Minister". At that time, this question was abstract...unintelligible...and, mostly perceived as a barb from elders which was designed to expose the lack of knowledge and humiliate in public. In short, I am amazed that at that time, when it was most asked, the question was as irrelevant as it could be and now, when we are all grown up, experienced and much more equipped to answer this question, it is never posed to us ! For so many days now, this question has been coming back to me..."What would I do if I were the Prime Minister??" So, I have decided to answer this question...
I will try to attempt answering this question in parts, and will post the parts on this blog as I write them. So the answer to this question will be serialized. I hope that when I am done with my answer, I would have written down a document giving the views of a common Indian on what he thinks that the Prime Ministers of this country should be doing for the betterment of its people. However, before I come to the actual answer, allow me the luxury of writing down my views on the attributes that should be present in a Prime Minister.

ATTRIBUTES OF  A "PRIME MINISTER" ?

Funny..isn't it ? We are so used the words 'Prime Minister' and so completely used to having the man around that we hardly ever pause to think what the office means and what should be the attributes of the 'Prime Minister'. To me, the words 'Prime Minister' signify all that is good and noble. I feel that the man occupying the chair of the 'Prime Minister' should practically be a saint. He should be above suspicion, universally respected and a person who leads by example. For the Prime Minister, the welfare of the people and their continuous betterment should be the only goal. ALL other activities that he does should merely be means leading to this goal. Existence of poverty, inequality and  illetracy should pain the Prime Minister on a daily basis like three thorns stuck into the flesh. Ideally, the Prime Minister should be on the younger side, highly articulate, with a vision and the administrative acumen plus the will to transform his vision into reality. In a nutshell, the Prime Minister should be a leader who is able to capture the essence of the collective consciousness of the nation and to channelize the latent energy of the population towards the achievement of seemingly impossible goals.





Thursday, September 6, 2012


The Fact about PPP (Public Private Partnership)

The Private Sector is like 'Ravan', the Public Sector is like 'Ram', and the Public of India is like 'Sita' . Once Ravan and Ram become friends (PPP), Poor Sita is sure to be molested....
 ·  ·  ·  · 44 minutes ago · 


  • Ruth ChangsanSargam Jain and 2 others like this.
  • 1 share

    • Gaurav Krishna Bansal In the name of Public Private Partnership, Public assets are handed over to private companies at throwaway prices. The private companies then charge the public for the use of public assets and the public pays through its nose to use assets that actually belong to it ! In the process, the public becomes poorer-forced to pay a private individual for using its own assets, and a private individual laughs all the way to the bank. And yes...the makers of the policy of PPP...welll...they also laugh all the way to the bank !!
      25 minutes ago ·  · 1

    • Gaurav Krishna Bansal It is the wanton duty of an elected government to provide the public with Bijlli, Paani, Sadak, Swasthya, Shiksha and Suraksha (BP4S) for free, because this is why the citizens pay taxes. However, we pay taxes for God knows what and then are forced to pay for BP4S in the name of 'Development' and 'PPP'
      22 minutes ago · 

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Albert Einstein =Beggar off the Streets

Dear Friends,
For quite some time a singular question has been troubling me. "Why is it that our electoral system is unable to produce quality leaders?" A bit like Kekule, who, in a dream, saw a snake curling up and taking its tail in its mouth and, based on this dream, deduced the structure of Benzene; yesterday the answer to this question struck me in a flash of revelation. And the answer was in the form of a frightfully simple equation:
Albert Einstein=Beggar off the Streets
This simple equation neatly defines the basic problems of our democracy. In order to understand this equation and its importance we only have to look around us. This is the mango season. If you go to the market to buy some mangoes, what do you see ? You see mangoes stacked up neatly on 'thelas' . Now suppose you go to one thela and demand mangoes worth Rs. 50/- what will the vendor do ? Will he simply allow you to count the mangoes and take them home ? Obviously not ! He will, in fact, ask you take a Kg of mangoes of a specific quality. So, in nature everything has a weight. Even two mangoes from the same tree are not alike. The one with greater weight fetches a higher price. However, in the kind of democracy that we have, people have only a number and no weight ! In our democracy, each adult is given the number one. That is, each adult in our democracy, is equal to every other adult regardless of his/her education, stature and contribution to the development of the nation. So from this absurd situation, arises the equation which embodies all the ills plaguing our democracy ...Albert Einstein=Beggar off the Streets !
In our democracy, Albert Einstein has the same electoral weight as that of a beggar. Now, to my mind nothing could be more absurd. I think that we all would be in agreement that Albert Einstein (if he were alive and a citizen of India) would contribute immensely to the development of the nation. I think that we would also agree unanimously that a person begging on the streets has zero role to play in national development. In-fact, his role is actually to introduce drag in the effort of the nation to move forward.  However, the number if  votes (weight) allotted to both the great scientist and the beggar are one each ! Effectively this means that the opinion of the beggar with regard to who should be governing the country is as important as that of the great scientist ! To my mind, this defeats logic. How can a beggar have the same vision, the same lucidity and the same logic that a scientist like Albert Einstein would have. And if we all unanimously accept that Albert Einstein is indeed superior to a beggar both in his ideas and his contribution to national development, then shouldn't he be given more weight in the electoral process ? How much extra weight (votes) will we give to Albert Einstein is a matter of debate. We could say that the vote of one Einstein is equal to the vote of ten beggars, or hundred beggars or one thousand ! but we cannot but accept that the existing equation (Einstein=Beggar) is wrong. I propose that the new equation should be:
Albert Einstein = 1000 Beggars 
It is because of the existing flawed equation which effectively equates apples with potatoes that we have the kind of (non)leaders that we have today. Look at it from the point of view of a politician. He has no incentive to try and win over an educated, contributing member of the society to his side. A politician knows that if he has to win the vote of Albert Einstein, he will have to spend a considerable time and effort in trying to convince the great scientist. He knows that he will have to show some vision and intellect for this purpose. However, in order to convince a beggar he needs only money and inducement. It is this flaw in the equation that has allowed the politician to steer conveniently clear of the intelligentsia of the nation and concentrate on the uneducated hordes instead. It is precisely for this reason that election after election, you, me and others like us who have a vision and are making a contribution in the development of the nation find ourselves marginalized. We find to our distress that our 'leaders' care two hoots for our concerns and aspirations because they are able to get all the winning votes they need by manipulating the uneducated masses of the country by a mix of  money, caste and religion. Now suppose the system was such that each graduate of the country carried a weight of ten (i.e vote of one graduate=vote of ten uneducated people), each professional carried a weight of 100 and so on; you would suddenly find the situation changing. Once the politician sees that if he is able to win over one educated, contributing voter, he stands to gain from 10 to 1000 votes (depending upon the stature of the voter), he will be inclined to spend his time and effort in listening to the intelligentsia of the nation.
Giving weights to the members of the intelligentsia (in voting) would also, to some extent, correct the the demographic imbalance created by family planning. It is a well known fact that the well-to-do and contributing members of our society are producing two children per couple on an average, while the non-contributing-uneducated masses are breeding like flies with five to six children per couple being the norm. The result is a demographic divide in this country where the people whose opinion should matter have become a minority which is even more conveniently ignored by politicians.
Thus, in sum and substance; if we want the democracy in India to improve and good leaders to be elected, we will have to change the equation from Albert Einstein=Beggar off the Streets to Albert Einstein = 1000 Beggars !!

Sunday, July 8, 2012

हम अंधे हिन्दुस्तानी


बिक रहा है मुल्क अपना,
और हम खामोश हैं,
ज़ात-मज़हब के नशे में,
इस क़दर बेहोश हैं,
के  हमें ये भी नज़र आता नहीं क्या हो रहा.....

कल तलक जो थे भिखारी,
आज राजा हो गए,
भर लिया गद्दों में पैसा,
ओढ़ रूपया सो गए;
लूट खाया मुल्क को,
लेकिन वो बाईमान हैं,
भेड़िये वहशी दरिन्दे,
बन रहे इंसान हैं ;
मुल्क का आवाम गाफिल,
आँख मूंदे सो रहा,
हाँ हमें ये भी नज़र आता नहीं क्या हो रहा.....

पैसा तेरा-पैसा मेरा,
स्विस बैंक में सब भर दिया,
लूट सोने का महल,
इक खंडहर सा घर दिया;
सिर्फ घोटाले मिले,
जब से हुए आज़ाद हम,
छिन गए सब हक़ हमारे,
हो गए बर्बाद हम;
मुल्क का हर शख्स जैसे,
लाश अपनी ढो  रहा,
हाँ हमें ये भी नज़र आता नहीं क्या हो रहा.....

घूमते नेता विदेशों में,
बड़े आराम से,
बेचते कुर्सी मिली जो,
मुल्क के आवाम से;
आम इन्सां  इस वतन का ,
जो मरा तो क्या हुआ?
हुक्मरानों की नज़र में,
जो हुआ अच्छा हुआ;
अब नहीं कुछ भी बचा है,
अब भरोसा खो रहा;
हाँ हमें ये भी नज़र आता नहीं क्या हो रहा.....

हर तरफ अब बेईमानी,
हर तरफ धोखा-फ़रेब,
लूट कर अहल-ए-वतन को,
भर रहे सब अपनी जेब;
मांगते हैं भीख बच्चे,
आज सड़कों पे तो क्या?
है गरीबों के लिए,
ना  घर ना  खाना ना दवा;
हंस रहे नौकर यहाँ,
मालिक बेचारा रो रहा;
हाँ हमें ये भी नज़र आता नहीं क्या हो रहा.....

हम किसे इलज़ाम दें,
गलती हमारी भी तो है,
आज देखो वो लुटा,
कल अपनी बारी भी तो है;
सोचता है क्यों तेरा ही,
आशियाँ बच जाएगा,
जिसने लूटा है मुझे वो,
घर तेरे भी आएगा;
ख़त्म हो जाएगा सबकुछ,
ये ही मंज़र जो रहा;
हाँ हमें ये भी नज़र आता नहीं क्या हो रहा,
हाँ हमें ये भी नज़र आता नहीं क्या हो रहा.....




Thursday, January 19, 2012

Is Indian bureaucracy the worst?

By: Srivatsa Krishna



IAS Officer



Bureaucracy bashing is India's favorite national vocation. And for good reason. Our bureaucracy has its good share of crooks, criminals and cheats who need to be put away - with or without a Lokpal. The simple counter-question is, does the bureaucracy have a disproportionately larger share of crooks than in other professions in

India, and the data clearly does not say a resounding yes.



In fact, there is perhaps roughly an equal proportion of crooks in the corporate sector (where routinely kickbacks are taken in large-scale procurement and bribing government), in politics, in the media (from paid news to fixing deals, blackmailing, etc), to professional service firms (reputed law firms becoming 'payment gateways' for bribes).

This article is meant to throw some light on the proverbial otherside. It is not meant to deny or defend the existence of crooks in the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) or other civil services, but merely shows the other side, because there is one. In the din surrounding corruption, even the finest of minds are making the mistake of tarring everyone with the same brush, which is simply not correct.

First, when the late Rajiv Gandhi was brutally assassinated in 1991, tempers ran high and there was mayhem all around in Sriperumbudur.One IPS officer, without any weapon on his self, protected the body from being ravaged. His name was Dr R K Raghavan, one of India's most distinguished police officers, whom the Supreme Court relies on routinely for helping them with sensitive cases, only because of hisimpartiality and honesty.

Second, if today millions of Indians are able to pay their electricity bills online or transact on their property easily, without paying bribes to anyone, the credit goes, not to a Lokpal watching over every single government servant, but to Rentala Chandrashekhar, J Satyanarayana and their extraordinary team of IAS officers whopioneered e-governance in the country.

Likewise, if Hyderabad became the toast of the global investorcommunity, with Microsoft establishing its only offshore facilityoutside the US till date, and Google, HSBC and Oracle, to name just afew, investing millions and creating thousands of jobs, the creditgoes to the same team.



Third, does anyone even begin to realise the kind of personal threatsto self and family, faced by V V Lakshminarayana of the IPS, and Dr U V Singh and Vipin Singh of the IFS, in taking on the intensely dangerous mining mafia or Ratn Sanjay in raiding and uncovering human remains inside the house of Shahabuddin, MP? Would an IIM, MBA or an IIT techie work in such a circumstance?

Fourth, how many of those who throw stones at the bureaucracy would be willing to step into the shoes of K M Abraham of the IAS, who took on the combined might of Reliance, Sahara Parivar and the Bank of Rajasthan, only to uphold the law and to maintain the independence ofan impartial regulator against all odds?

And the very same corporate sector, which hands out stories on morality to the bureaucracy, must not forget that more often than not, many of them, not all, want to eagerly subvert the system and break 
the law for a little exclusive privilege or gain.

Fifth, talk to any CEO in India's insurance industry, and he will tell you that the industry as a whole was able to get founded only because of the leadership and the level playing field provided by N Rangachary, an outstanding IRS officer, when he was in Irda, because of which premiums as a percentage of GDP grew from 2.3% (in 2000) to

6.7% (in 2010), and there are about 50 private insurance companies in India today.



Sixth, the country's first PPP airport in Kochi, built at a cost of only 300 crore, including the cost of 1,300 acres, was used by 4.5 million passengers in 2011 and returned a profit of 100 crore. No model concession agreement and no user charges. Just the outstanding leadership provided by V J Kurien of the IAS.

The message that one must appreciate is that there are countless civil servants doing extraordinary work, in equally extraordinary circumstances - the above examples are not exceptions but examples of 
many in the system who are doing quiet, outstanding work. Just because 

they don't figure in the media or are not visible all the time doesn't 
mean they don't exist.

Ask yourself, would an N Chandra produce the magic of making TCS India's largest IT company if he were reporting to a Pappu Yadav and not to S Ramadorai? Would Nandan Nilekani and Shibulal have created the globally-admired brand Infosys, but for N R Narayanamurthy's fabled leadership, and instead if they had a Suresh Kalmadi to report to?

Never forget, Paul O'Neil and Robert McNamara, the titans who shaped the destinies of Alcoa and Ford, failed badly as US Treasury and Defense secretaries, respectively. One of the main reasons India exists as one, despite the various fissiparous tendencies, is the glue of the bureaucracy, which holds  together an intensely diverse, heterogeneous country is due to the good work of many outstanding officers, albeit with many bumps.

Maybe not every IAS officer is unable to understand the vulnerability of his views in the face of alternate opinions. Maybe he is unable to break away from rigid, stated positions to appreciate a very different view, perhaps because of the complex workings of our fabled democracy. India has one of the finest higher civil services in the world, sitting on one of the worst lower bureaucracies - both with honourable exceptions. Don't tar everyone with the same hue and support those in the civil service doing good work. This unarguable truth must be driven home.

(This Article was received by me on E-mail, sent to me by shri D.vasudeva reddy IRTS. It is so good that I thought that I must share it with all of you....)